Phase resetting neural oscillators: Topological theory versus the realworld

15Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Biological oscillations, despite their vast range of periodicities, can be described mathematically by stable limit cycles. Therefore, a general theory characterizing the effects of perturbations applied to such limit cycles allows predictions of qualitative features of a particular oscillation subject to perturbation. In this chapter, we summarize this topological approach and discuss ways in which the theory breaks down, mainly for neuronal and cardiac oscillators. In particular, we describe experimental and computational studies that demonstrate apparent discontinuities in the response to perturbations, and others where there is not a rapid return to the limit cycle following a perturbation. Finally, we discuss differences between the topological and the excitability-type descriptions of neuronal oscillators.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krogh-Madsen, T., Butera, R., Bard Ermentrout, G., & Glass, L. (2012). Phase resetting neural oscillators: Topological theory versus the realworld. In Phase Response Curves in Neuroscience: Theory, Experiment, and Analysis (pp. 33–51). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0739-3_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free