What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature

9Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Multiple studies have demonstrated the benefits of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS), but in several countries it has still not been widely adopted. LCS training is associated with several challenges, such as patient safety concerns and a steep learning curve. Current evidence may facilitate designing of efficient training curricula to overcome these challenges. Basic training with virtual reality simulators has witnessed meteoric advances and may be essential during the early parts of the learning curve. Cadaveric and animal model training still constitutes an indispensable training tool, due to a higher degree of difficulty and greater resemblance to real operative conditions. In addition, recent evidence favors the use of novel training paradigms, such as proficiency-based training, case selection and modular training. This review summarizes the recent advances in LCS training and provides the evidence for designing an efficient training curriculum to overcome the challenges of LCS training.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gaitanidis, A., Simopoulos, C., & Pitiakoudis, M. (2018, March 1). What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature. Techniques in Coloproctology. Springer-Verlag Italia s.r.l. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-018-1760-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free