Exchanging Reasons: Responses to critics

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

I provide responses to what I take to be the most salient aspects of John Biro, James Freeman, David Hitchcock, Robert Pinto, Harvey Siegel and Luis Vega's criticisms to the normative model for argumentation that I have developed in Giving Reasons. Each response is articulated on a main question, i.e., the distinction between regulative and constitutive normativity within Argumentation Theory's models, the semantic appraisal of argumentation, the concept of justification, the differences between Toulmin's model and my model of argument and the analysis of the pragmatic dimension of argumentation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bermejo-Luque, L. (2011). Exchanging Reasons: Responses to critics. Theoria-Revista De Teoria Historia Y Fundamentos De La Ciencia. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.2954

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free