I provide responses to what I take to be the most salient aspects of John Biro, James Freeman, David Hitchcock, Robert Pinto, Harvey Siegel and Luis Vega's criticisms to the normative model for argumentation that I have developed in Giving Reasons. Each response is articulated on a main question, i.e., the distinction between regulative and constitutive normativity within Argumentation Theory's models, the semantic appraisal of argumentation, the concept of justification, the differences between Toulmin's model and my model of argument and the analysis of the pragmatic dimension of argumentation.
CITATION STYLE
Bermejo-Luque, L. (2011). Exchanging Reasons: Responses to critics. Theoria-Revista De Teoria Historia Y Fundamentos De La Ciencia. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.2954
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.