Invited Commentary: Linking Job Security and Mental Health - Challenges and Future Directions

5Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Research in the social and health sciences has linked job insecurity to poorer mental health but relies on observational data and faces challenges of causal inference. LaMontagne et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2021;190(2):207-215) innovate by using both within-person fixed-effects and random-effects regression to analyze data from 14 annual waves of an Australian survey spanning 2002-2015. Using this more rigorous design, they find that improvements in perceived job insecurity were associated with improvements in Mental Health Inventory-5 scores in a large, nationally representative panel study. By using each respondent as their own control, fixed-effects models remove the influence of time-invariant confounders. Innovative new approaches are still needed to address the causal directionality of the association and to capture both those whose exposure changes as well as those for whom it persists. Future work should also consider potential modifying factors including societal conditions, macroeconomic and other period effects, and characteristics of individuals, as well as drawing on multidisciplinary approaches that consider jobs as a combination of multiple health-relevant exposures and embed individual workers in families and communities to assess the full reach and consequences of perceived job insecurity.

References Powered by Scopus

3777Citations
2190Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

20Citations
66Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burgard, S. (2021, February 1). Invited Commentary: Linking Job Security and Mental Health - Challenges and Future Directions. American Journal of Epidemiology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaa039

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

88%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

38%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

25%

Psychology 2

25%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0