Comparison of quality-control rules used in clinical chemistry laboratories

13Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Numerous papers have been written to show which combinations of Shewhart-type quality-control charts are optimal for detecting systematic shifts in the mean response of a process, increases in the random error of a process, and linear drift effects in the mean response across the assay batch. One paper by Westgard et al. (Clin Chem 1977;23:1857-67) especially seems to have attracted the attention of users. Here we derive detailed results that enable the characteristics of the various Shewhart-type control schemes, including the multirule scheme (Clin Chem 1981;27:493-501), to be calculated and show that a fundamental formula proposed by Westgard et al. in the earlier paper is in error, although their derived results are not seriously wrong. We also show that, from a practical point of view, a suitably chosen Cusum scheme is near optimal for all the types and combinations of errors discussed, thereby removing the selection problem for the user.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bishop, J., & Nix, A. B. J. (1993). Comparison of quality-control rules used in clinical chemistry laboratories. Clinical Chemistry, 39(8), 1638–1649. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/39.8.1638

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free