Mathematical Modeling of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Function: What Can We Learn from Empirical and Mechanistic Models?

  • Roche D
  • Gil D
  • Giraldo J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Empirical and mechanistic models differ in their approaches to theanalysis of pharmacological effect. Whereas the parameters of the formerare not physical constants those of the latter embody the nature, oftencomplex, of biology. Empirical models are exclusively used for curvefitting, merely to characterize the shape of the E/{[}A] curves.Mechanistic models, on the contrary, enable the examination ofmechanistic hypotheses by parameter simulation. Regretfully, the manyparameters that mechanistic models may include can represent a greatdifficulty for curve fitting, representing, thus, a challenge forcomputational method development. In the present study some empiricaland mechanistic models are shown and the connections, which may appearin a number of cases between them, are analyzed from the curves theyyield. It may be concluded that systematic and careful curve shapeanalysis can be extremely useful for the understanding of receptorfunction, ligand classification and drug discovery, thus providing acommon language for the communication between pharmacologists andmedicinal chemists.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roche, D., Gil, D., & Giraldo, J. (2014). Mathematical Modeling of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Function: What Can We Learn from Empirical and Mechanistic Models? (pp. 159–181). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7423-0_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free