Prenatal stress effects in a wild, long-lived primate: Predictive adaptive responses in an unpredictable environment

58Citations
Citations of this article
154Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Prenatal maternal stress affects offspring phenotype in numerous species including humans, but it is debated whether these effects are evolutionarily adaptive. Relating stress to adverse conditions, current explanations invoke either short-term developmental constraints on offspring phenotype resulting in decelerated growth to avoid starvation, or long-term predictive adaptive responses (PARs) resulting in accelerated growth and reproduction in response to reduced life expectancies. TwoPARsubtypeswere proposed, acting either on predicted internal somatic states or predicted external environmental conditions, but because both affect phenotypes similarly, they are largely indistinguishable. Only external (not internal) PARs rely on high environmental stability particularly in long-lived species. We report on a crucial test case in a wild long-lived mammal, the Assamese macaque (Macaca assamensis), which evolved and lives in an unpredictable environment where external PARs are probably not advantageous. We quantified food availability, growth, motor skills, maternal caretaking style and maternal physiological stress from faecal glucocorticoid measures. Prenatal maternal stress was negatively correlated to prenatal food availability and led to accelerated offspring growth accompanied by decelerated motor skill acquisition and reduced immune function. These results support the ‘internal PAR’ theory, which stresses the role of stable adverse internal somatic states rather than stable external environments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Berghänel, A., Heistermann, M., Schülke, O., & Ostner, J. (2016). Prenatal stress effects in a wild, long-lived primate: Predictive adaptive responses in an unpredictable environment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283(1839). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1304

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free