Commentary—A Dimon in the Rough: Apologetic Crisis Management at JPMorgan Chase

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

When companies are caught in a crisis, the need to deliver a defense in order to salvage their damaged reputation is an ongoing challenge. Drawing from actional legitimacy and apologia theory, this article examines corporate use of crisis communication through a case study surrounding Jamie Dimon, CEO at JPMorgan Chase. Dimon found himself in a crisis from 2012 to 2013 when a so-called “London Whale” made a series of trades that cost the company $6 billion U. S. Dollars, and raised serious questions over Dimon’s judgment and ability to lead JPMorgan Chase. In particular, we argue that the restoration of actional legitimacy centers around strategies of mortification, (corrective) action, justification, and authorization.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hearit, K. M., & Hearit, L. B. (2023). Commentary—A Dimon in the Rough: Apologetic Crisis Management at JPMorgan Chase. International Journal of Business Communication, 60(1), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488420932303

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free