Comparison analysis of cockroft - Latham criterion values of commercial plasticine and C45 steel

7Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The paper presents and compares the results of theoretical and experimental research in the field of cracking of model material (commercial plasticine) and C45 steel in hot forming conditions. The aim of the research was to determine the limit values of the Cockroft-Latham integral for both materials. The presented research methodology includes experimental tests (tensile tests) and numerical simulations carried out in the DEFORM-3D program. For laboratory tests, axially symmetric samples made of C45 steel and model material were used. On the basis of the obtained experimental and numerical results, a comparative analysis of both materials was carried out.

References Powered by Scopus

Ductile fracture: Experiments and computations

492Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Material fracture and burr formation in blanking results of FEM simulations and comparison with experiments

155Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Flow behavior of Plasticine used in physical modeling of metal forming processes

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The study of central cracking mechanism and criterion in cross wedge rolling

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Physical modeling of cross wedge rolling limitations

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CFD-enhanced description of local viscous flow through expansion equal channel angular extrusion geometric domain

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wójcik, Ł., & Pater, Z. (2018). Comparison analysis of cockroft - Latham criterion values of commercial plasticine and C45 steel. Acta Mechanica et Automatica, 12(4), 286–293. https://doi.org/10.2478/ama-2018-0044

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

44%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 7

70%

Design 1

10%

Materials Science 1

10%

Computer Science 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free