Is laser-assisted hatching better than mechanical method for enhancing pregnancy rate in frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles?

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effect of laser-assisted hatching (LAH) compared with mechanical-assisted hatching (MAH) for en- hancing clinical outcomes in frozen-thawed blastocysts (FTBs) transfer cycles. Materials and Methods: The culture of all pronucleate embryos to the blastocyst stage and the selection of blastocysts ≥ grade 3BB (Gardner and Schooleraft score), followed by FTBs trans- fer cycles with LAH (n=105) or with MAH (n=101). Clinical outcomes including clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates were investi- gated. Results: There were no significant differences in clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates between LAH and MAH groups in FTBs transfer cycles. Conclusion: LAH does not improve pregnancy outcomes significantly compared to MAH in FTBs transfer cycles.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, Y. J., Kim, S. C., Joo, J. K., Kim, H. G., Ko, G. R., Kim, C. W., & Lee, K. S. (2020). Is laser-assisted hatching better than mechanical method for enhancing pregnancy rate in frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles? Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology, 47(1), 65–69. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog.2020.01.5023

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free