The Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale: A tool to assess neurologic function for integration into the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria

160Citations
Citations of this article
235Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. The Macdonald criteria and the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria defne radiologic parameters to classify therapeutic outcome among patients with malignant glioma and specify that clinical status must be incorporated and prioritized for overall assessment. But neither provides specifc parameters to do so. We hypothesized that a standardized metric to measure neurologic function will permit more effective overall response assessment in neuro-oncology. Methods. An international group of physicians including neurologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and neurosurgeons with expertise in neuro-oncology drafted the Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale as an objective and quantifable metric of neurologic function evaluable during a routine offce examination. The scale was subsequently tested in a multicenter study to determine its overall reliability, interobserver variability, and feasibility. Results. The NANO scale is a quantifable evaluation of 9 relevant neurologic domains based on direct observation and testing conducted during routine offce visits. The score defnes overall response criteria. A prospective, multinational study noted a >90% inter-observer agreement rate with kappa statistic ranging from 0.35 to 0.83 (fair to almost perfect agreement), and a median assessment time of 4 minutes (interquartile range, 3-5). Conclusion. The NANO scale provides an objective clinician-reported outcome of neurologic function with high inter-observer agreement. It is designed to combine with radiographic assessment to provide an overall assessment of outcome for neuro-oncology patients in clinical trials and in daily practice. Furthermore, it complements existing patient-reported outcomes and cognition testing to combine for a global clinical outcome assessment of well-being among brain tumor patients.

References Powered by Scopus

The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data

60467Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales

31795Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic

12997Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

EANO guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diffuse gliomas of adulthood

1104Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Response assessment in neuro-oncology clinical trials

329Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EANO–ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with brain metastasis from solid tumours <sup>☆</sup>

327Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nayak, L., Deangelis, L. M., Brandes, A. A., Peereboom, D. M., Galanis, E., Lin, N. U., … Reardon, D. A. (2017). The Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale: A tool to assess neurologic function for integration into the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. Neuro-Oncology, 19(5), 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nox029

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 57

51%

Researcher 29

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 16

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 9

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 85

70%

Neuroscience 25

20%

Nursing and Health Professions 8

7%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free