Two experiments contrasted short-term memory and sensory memory (precategorical acoustic storage) explanations of the stimulus suffix effect. Experiment 1 attempted to interfere with recency recall by forcing subjects to encode nonverbal acoustic suffixes into a verbal, articulatory code. Subjects in this condition showed recall that was comparable to that of subjects who were told to ignore the suffixes. However, Experiment 2 showed that silently mouthed articulation of a suffix can produce interference on recall of recency items, although not as much as that produced by vocal articulation. The results are discussed in terms of current models of the stimulus suffix effect. © 1982 Psychonomic Society, Inc.
CITATION STYLE
Nairne, J. S., & Crowder, R. G. (1982). On the locus of the stimulus suffix effect. Memory & Cognition, 10(4), 350–357. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202427
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.