Subjective and objective knowledge: Persistent puzzles

3Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The chapters in this volume reveal the large amount of information that would be available about individuals’ biological condition with the wise use of biomarkers. An intriguing fact about this information is that it is very often (perhaps always) about oneself. This fact involves several of the studies in one of the deepest and most controversial of philosophical topics. Simply stated, it is the relation between objective and subjective knowledge. Knowledge about oneself has a special status in philosophy and carries special problems. Examples of self-knowledge that appear in philosophical discourse are different from those of interest to human biologists, but they involve intriguing similarities. This chapter will report on the present state of argument in academic philosophy regarding the relation between objective and subjective knowledge. It will then show how several of the chapters in this volume bring human biologists face-to-face with the same puzzles philosophers are currently struggling with.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amundson, R. (2016). Subjective and objective knowledge: Persistent puzzles. In Biological Measures of Human Experience across the Lifespan: Making Visible the Invisible (pp. 303–309). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44103-0_14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free