Protein-DNA interactions in the T4 dNTP synthetase complex dependent on gene 32 single-stranded DNA-binding protein

14Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Our laboratory has reported data suggesting a role for T4 phage gene 32 single-stranded DNA-binding protein in organizing a complex of deoxyribonucleotide-synthesizing enzymes at the replication fork. In this article we examined the effects of gene 32 ablation on the association of these enzymes with DNA-protein complexes. These experiments showed several deoxyribonucleotide-synthesizing enzymes to be present in DNA-protein complexes, with some of these associations being dependent on gene 32 protein. To further understand the role of gp32, we created amber mutations at codons 24 and 204 of gene 32, which encodes a 301-residue protein. We used the newly created mutants along with several experimental approaches - DNA-cellulose chromatography, immunoprecipitation, optical biosensor analysis and glutathione-S-transferase pulldowns - to identify relevant protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions. These experiments identified several proteins whose interactions with DNA depend on the presence of intact gp32, notably thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate (DHF) reductase, ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) and Escherichia coli nucleoside diphosphate (NDP) kinase, and they also demonstrated direct associations between gp32 and RNR and NDP kinase, but not dCMP hydroxymethylase, deoxyribonucleoside monophosphate kinase, or DHF reductase. Taken together, the results support the hypothesis that the gene 32 protein helps to recruit enzymes of deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates synthesis to DNA replication sites. © 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, J., Wheeler, L. J., Shen, R., & Mathews, C. K. (2005). Protein-DNA interactions in the T4 dNTP synthetase complex dependent on gene 32 single-stranded DNA-binding protein. Molecular Microbiology, 55(5), 1502–1514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04486.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free