Patient perspective on the value of genetic counselling for familial pancreas cancer

22Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess patient views regarding the value of genetic counselling for familial pancreas cancer in the absence of predictive genetic testing. Patients and methods: At-risk adults with three or more relatives with pancreas cancer received genetic counselling prior to research screening via endoscopic ultrasound. Questionnaires were mailed after the visit to assess perceived value of the counselling session. Results: Ninety-three percent of respondents felt genetic counselling for pancreas cancer was helpful despite the lack of a causative gene, while only 7% felt that it should not be offered until such a gene is discovered. Over half of respondents believed the pancreas cancer in their family was caused by a gene mutation, and 42% thought they had inherited the mutation. The average perceived lifetime risk of developing pancreas cancer was 51%, and 87% of respondents would ultimately seek predictive genetic testing. When more information is gained, 89% would be interested in another genetic counselling session, and 82% would recommend current genetic counselling for pancreas cancer to a friend or relative with a family history of the disease. Conclusion: Despite the lack of an identified major causative gene for pancreas cancer, respondents found genetic counselling for this malignancy to be helpful. These patients perceive their personal cancer risk to be high, and would seek predictive genetic testing if it were available. Referral for genetic counselling should be offered to appropriate individuals.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Axilbund, J. E., Brune, K. A., Canto, M. I., Brehon, B. C., Wroblewski, L. D., & Griffin, C. A. (2005). Patient perspective on the value of genetic counselling for familial pancreas cancer. Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, 3(3), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1186/1897-4287-3-3-115

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free