Comparison between the 1% and 2% ibopamine provocative test in primary open-angle glaucoma patients: Sensitivity, specificity and tolerability

6Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) rise in normal individuals and primary open-angle glaucoma patients and the safety and efficacy of ibopamine eye drops in different concentrations as a provocative test for glaucoma. Methods: Glaucoma patients underwent (same eye) the ibopamine provocative test with two concentrations, 1% and 2%, in a random sequence at least 3 weeks apart, but not more than 3 months. The normal individuals were randomly submitted to one of the concentrations of ibopamine (1% and 2%). The test was considered positive if there was an IOP rise greater than 3 or 4 mmHg at 30 or 45 minutes to test which subset of the test has the best sensitivity (Se)/specificity (Sp). Results: There was no statistically significant difference in any of the IOP measurements, comparing 1% with 2% ibopamine. The IOP was significantly higher at 30 and 45 minutes with both concentrations (p<0.001). The best sensitivity/specificity ratio was achieved with the cutoff point set as greater than 3 mmHg at 45 minutes with 2% ibopamine (area under the ROC curve: 0.864, Se: 84.6%; Sp:73.3%). All patients described a slight burning after ibopamine's instillation. Conclusion: 2% ibopamine is recommended as a provocative test for glaucoma. Because both concentrations have similar ability to rise IOP, 1% ibopamine may be used to treat ocular hypotony.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Magacho, L., Costa, M. L., Dessimoni, A., & de Ávila, M. P. (2006). Comparison between the 1% and 2% ibopamine provocative test in primary open-angle glaucoma patients: Sensitivity, specificity and tolerability. Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, 69(5), 695–699. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-27492006000500015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free