Skill-biased acquisitions? Human capital and employee mobility in small technology firms

0Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between acquisitions and mobility of knowledge workers and managers in small technology companies and how individual skills and capabilities moderate this relationship. Relying on the matched employer–employee data of the Swedish high-tech sectors from 2007 to 2015, we find that acquisitions increase the likelihood of employee departures, mainly in the form of switching to another employer, but that these acquisition effects are weaker for employees with technological competences. By contrast, the acquisition effects are found to be weaker for employees with managerial competences only when acquirers have a strong employee retention motive. When acquirers do not have a strong retention motive, managers, compared to other employees, are more likely to exit the (national) labor market after acquisitions. Our results suggest that the retention motive is a critical condition to explain post-acquisition employee turnover. Both technological and managerial competences are the types of human capital valued by acquirers when they have a strong retention motive.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xiao, J., & Dahlstrand, Å. L. (2023). Skill-biased acquisitions? Human capital and employee mobility in small technology firms. Small Business Economics, 60(3), 1219–1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00654-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free