Effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment intervention on quality of life, caregiver burden and length of hospital stay: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

37Citations
Citations of this article
161Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) interventions can improve functional ability and reduce mortality in older adults, but the effectiveness of CGA intervention on the quality of life, caregiver burden, and length of hospital stay remains unclear. The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of CGA intervention on the quality of life, length of hospital stay, and caregiver burden in older adults by conducting meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: A literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted for papers published before February 29, 2020, based on inclusion criteria. Standardised mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated using the random-effects model. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias analyses were also conducted. Results: A total of 28 RCTs were included. Overall, the intervention components common in different CGA intervention models were interdisciplinary assessments and team meetings. Meta-analyses showed that CGA interventions improved the quality of life of older people (SMD = 0.12; 95% CI = 0.03 to 0.21; P = 0.009) compared to usual care, and subgroup analyses showed that CGA interventions improved the quality of life only in participants’ age > 80 years and at follow-up ≤3 months. The change value of quality of life in the CGA intervention group was better than that in the usual care group on six dimensions of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36). Also, compared to usual care, the CGA intervention reduced the caregiver burden (SMD = − 0.56; 95% CI = − 0.97 to − 0.15, P = 0.007), but had no significant effect on the length of hospital stay. Conclusions: CGA intervention was effective in improving the quality of life and reducing caregiver burden, but did not affect the length of hospital stay. It is recommended that future studies apply the SF-36 to evaluate the impact of CGA interventions on the quality of life and provide supportive strategies for caregivers as an essential part of the CGA intervention, to find additional benefits of CGA interventions.

References Powered by Scopus

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

48733Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (Sf-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection

30891Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

22353Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Effectiveness of acute geriatric unit care on functional decline, clinical and process outcomes among hospitalised older adults with acute medical complaints: A systematic review and meta-analysis

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A national study of 23 major trauma centres to investigate the effect of a geriatrician assessment on clinical outcomes in older people admitted with serious injury in England (FiTR 2): a multicentre observational cohort study

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effectiveness of geriatric assessment and management in older cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-Analysis

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, Z., Ding, Z., Chen, C., Sun, Y., Jiang, Y., Liu, F., & Wang, S. (2021). Effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment intervention on quality of life, caregiver burden and length of hospital stay: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMC Geriatrics, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02319-2

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 40

77%

Researcher 6

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 24

47%

Nursing and Health Professions 12

24%

Psychology 12

24%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0