Innovating to Improve Access: Changing the Way Courts Regulate Legal Markets

8Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Struggling to navigate a world that is increasingly shaped by legal rules and obligations, most ordinary Americans lack real access to courts. Often this means simply forgoing legal rights and entitlements or giving up in the face of claims of wrongdoing. Among those who cannot avoid courts-such as those facing eviction, collection, or foreclosure and those seeking child support, custodial access, or protection from violence or harassment-the vast majority (as many as 99 percent in some cases) find themselves in court without any legal assistance at all. There are many reasons for this lack of meaningful access, including the under funding of courts and legal aid, but perhaps the most fundamental is the excessively restrictive American approach to regulating legal markets. This regulation, controlled by the American legal profession and judiciary, closes off the potential for significant reductions in the cost of, and hence increases in access to, courts. Unlike the problem of funding, that is a problem that state courts have the power, if they can find the judicial will, to change. © 2014 by Gillian K. Hadfield.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hadfield, G. K. (2014). Innovating to Improve Access: Changing the Way Courts Regulate Legal Markets. Daedalus, 143(3), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00290

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free