THE OBJECTIVITY OF THE BUSINESS COMPETITION SUPERVISORY COMMISSION IN DECIDING BUSINESS COMPETITION CASES IN INDONESIA

  • Khairazi R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study discusses the commission board’s objectivity in a trial while deciding a business court case. This study aims to identify the commission board and investigators’ authority in a courthouse, and the fact that they are in the same institution as well as the concern. This study uses a type of normative research through a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This research’s document source is obtained by tracing statutory regulations, especially those related to business competition. The research shows a relationship that can affect The Indonesian Competition Commission (ICC) decision regarding the extent of authority that ICC has, as contained in the provisions of Article 36 of Law No. 5/1999. This obscurity can provide legal loopholes that have potentially offer a wide range of unlawful authority for ICC. Therefore, the Government has to amend the current regulation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khairazi, R. (2021). THE OBJECTIVITY OF THE BUSINESS COMPETITION SUPERVISORY COMMISSION IN DECIDING BUSINESS COMPETITION CASES IN INDONESIA. Indonesia Private Law Review, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v2i1.2146

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free