Incremental learning of planning actions in model-based reinforcement learning

14Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The soundness and optimality of a plan depends on the correctness of the domain model. Specifying complete domain models can be difficult when interactions between an agent and its environment are complex. We propose a model-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) approach to solve planning problems with unknown models. The model is learned incrementally over episodes using only experiences from the current episode which suits non-stationary environments. We introduce the novel concept of reliability as an intrinsic motivation for MBRL, and a method to learn from failure to prevent repeated instances of similar failures. Our motivation is to improve the learning efficiency and goal-directedness of MBRL. We evaluate our work with experimental results for three planning domains.

References Powered by Scopus

R-MAX - A general polynomial time algorithm for near-optimal reinforcement learning

752Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Learning symbolic models of stochastic domains

157Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Knowledge Acquisition Bottleneck: Time for Reassessment?

105Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Creativity of AI: Automatic Symbolic Option Discovery for Facilitating Deep Reinforcement Learning

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Asking the Right Questions: Learning Interpretable Action Models Through Query Answering

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

GLIB: Efficient Exploration for Relational Model-Based Reinforcement Learning via Goal-Literal Babbling

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alvin Ng, J. H., & Petrick, R. P. A. (2019). Incremental learning of planning actions in model-based reinforcement learning. In IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 2019-August, pp. 3195–3201). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2019/443

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

85%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Researcher 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 14

88%

Decision Sciences 1

6%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free