Background exposure versus additional exposure in human biomonitoring

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Due to the improved analytical methods, it is now possible to measure in man hazardous chemicals or their activation products in human blood and tissues. Biomarkers have been identified whose tissue level reflects the internal exposure resulting from all sources of uptake – including the contribution of endogenously occurring products (biological monitoring). One step further to risk assessment is the measurement of protein and DNA adducts (biochemical effect monitoring) which reflects the body burden with reactive metabolites. Applying these methods it turned out that in most cases not only the exposed but also not knowingly exposed controls had significant adduct levels. This raised questions about the existence of background exposures and their role for risk assessment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Neumann, H. G. (2014). Background exposure versus additional exposure in human biomonitoring. In Regulatory Toxicology (pp. 439–447). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35374-1_60

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free