Everything in NP can be argued in perfect zero-knowledge in a bounded number of rounds

12Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A perfect zero-knowledge interactive protocol allows a prover to convince a verifier of the validity of a statement in a way that does not give the verifier any additional information [GMR, GMW]. Such protocols take place by the exchange of messages back and forth between the prover and the verifier. An important measure of efficiency for these protocols is the number of rounds in the interaction. In previously known perfect zero-knowledge protocols for statements concerning NP-complete problems [BCC], at least k rounds were necessary in order to prevent one party from having a probability of undetected cheating greater than 2-k. In the full version of this paper [BCY], we give the first perfect zero-knowledge protocol that offers arbitrarily high security for any statement in NP with a constant number of rounds (under a suitable cryptographic assumption). This protocol is a BCC-argument rather than a GMR-proof [BC3], as are all the known perfect zero-knowledge protocols for NP-complete problems [BCC].

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brassard, G., Crépeau, C., & Yung, M. (1990). Everything in NP can be argued in perfect zero-knowledge in a bounded number of rounds. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 434 LNCS, pp. 192–195). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46885-4_21

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free