Step 3 of EBP: Part 3—Meta-analysis and Systematic Reviews, Aggregating Research Results

  • Drisko J
  • Grady M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Step 3 of the EBP process centers on evaluating the quality and relevance of research results. This chapter examines the aggregation and evaluation of multiple research studies using a method called the systematic review. Systematic reviews locate and combine the results of multiple studies using clearly defined and transparently reported standards. The statistical results of studies are aggregated and compared using a set of techniques called meta-analysis. As terminology has evolved in this area, the shared and distinct features of systematic reviews and meta-analyses are carefully defined and distinguished. The standards for Cochrane Collaboration quality reviews are identified. A Cochrane systematic review is analyzed in detail to show the strength and limitations of such publications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Drisko, J. W., & Grady, M. D. (2019). Step 3 of EBP: Part 3—Meta-analysis and Systematic Reviews, Aggregating Research Results (pp. 155–176). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15224-6_8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free