On the entanglement entropy of Maxwell theory: a condensed matter perspective

7Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Despite the seeming simplicity of the theory, calculating (and even defining) entanglement entropy for the Maxwell theory of a U(1) gauge field in (3+1) dimensions has been the subject of controversy. It is generally accepted that the ground state entanglement entropy for a region of linear size L behaves as an area law with a subleading logarithm, S = αL2 − γ log L. While the logarithmic coefficient γ is believed to be universal, there has been disagreement about its precise value. After carefully accounting for subtle boundary corrections, multiple analyses in the high energy literature have converged on an answer related to the conformal trace anomaly, which is only sensitive to the local curvature of the partition. In contrast, a condensed matter treatment of the problem yielded a topological contribution which is not captured by the conformal field theory calculation. In this perspective piece, we review aspects of the various calculations and discuss the resolution of the discrepancy, emphasizing the important role played by charged states (the “extended Hilbert space”) in defining entanglement for a gauge theory. While the trace anomaly result is sufficient for a strictly pure gauge field, coupling the gauge field to dynamical charges of mass m gives a topological contribution to γ which survives even in the m → ∞ limit. For many situations, the topological contribution from dynamical charges is physically meaningful and should be taken into account. We also comment on other common issues of entanglement in gauge theories, such as entanglement distillation, algebraic definitions of entanglement, and gauge-fixing procedures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pretko, M. (2018). On the entanglement entropy of Maxwell theory: a condensed matter perspective. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2018(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2018)102

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free