Building decision procedures for modal logics from propositional decision procedures: The case study of modal K(m)

34Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to propose a new technique for developing decision procedures for propositional modal logics. The basic idea is that propositional modal decision procedures should be developed on top of propositional decision procedures. As a case study, we consider satisfiability in modal K(m), that is modal K with m modalities, and develop an algorithm, called KSAT, on top of an implementation of the Davis-Putnam-Longemann-Loveland procedure. KSAT is thoroughly tested and compared with various procedures and in particular with the state-of-the-art tableau-based system KRIS. The experimental results show that KSAT outperforms KRIS and the other systems of orders of magnitude, highlight an intrinsic weakness of tableau-based decision procedures, and provide partial evidence of a phase transition phenomenon for K(m). © 2000 Academic Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Giunchiglia, F., & Sebastiani, R. (2000). Building decision procedures for modal logics from propositional decision procedures: The case study of modal K(m). Information and Computation, 162(1–2), 158–178. https://doi.org/10.1006/inco.1999.2850

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free