Pegaptanib sodium as maintenance therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: The LEVEL study

45Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: To assess the efficacy of pegaptanib as maintenance therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NV-AMD) patients after induction therapy. Methods: A phase IV, prospective, open-label, uncontrolled exploratory study including subjects with subfoveal NV-AMD who had had one to three induction treatments 30-120 days before entry and showed investigator-determined clinical/anatomical NV-AMD improvement. Lesions in the study eye were: any subtype, 12 or fewer disc areas; postinduction centre point thickness (CPT) 275 mm or less or thinning of 100 mm or more (optical coherence tomography); visual acuity (VA) 20/20-20/400. Intravitreal pegaptanib 0.3 mg was administered as maintenance every 6 weeks for 48 weeks with follow-up to week 54. Booster treatment additional unscheduled treatment for wet agerelated macular degeneration, was allowed in the study eye at the investigators' discretion for clinical deterioration. Results: Of 568 enrolled subjects, 86% completed 1 year of pegaptanib. Mean VA improvement during induction (49.6 to 65.5 letters) was well preserved (54-week mean 61.8 letters). Mean CPT was relatively stable during maintenance (20 μm increase during the study). Fifty per cent did not receive unscheduled booster treatment to week 54; 46% did have one such booster (mean 147 days after maintenance initiation). Conclusions: An induction-maintenance strategy, using non-selective then selective vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors, could be considered for NV-AMD. This approach may have particular relevance for patients with systemic comorbidities who require long-term anti-VEGF therapy for NV-AMD.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Friberg, T. R., & Tolentino, M. (2010). Pegaptanib sodium as maintenance therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: The LEVEL study. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 94(12), 1611–1617. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2009.174946

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free