Comparative efficacy and tolerability of pholcodine and dextromethorphan in the management of patients with acute, non-productive cough: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study

13Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of pholcodine with that of dextromethorphan, one of the most used cough sedative products, in patients with acute, non-productive cough. Methods: 129 adults with a diagnosis of acute, frequent, non-productive cough participated in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter trial. Medications were in a syrup formulation and were taken orally three times daily for 3 days. The efficacy endpoints were the change from baseline in the daytime and night-time cough frequency on 5-point scales at day 3, and cough intensity. Results: A reduction of 1.4 and 1.3 points in the mean daytime cough frequency at day 3 was seen in the pholcodine and dextromethorphan groups, respectively, in the per-protocol population. The reduction in mean night-time cough was 1.3 for both groups. Cough intensity reduction was 0.7 for pholcodine and 0.8 for dextromethorphan. Conclusions: These findings indicate that the efficacy of a 3-day course of pholcodine is similar to that of dextromethorphan in the treatment of adult patients with acute, non-productive cough. Both medications were well tolerated. © 2006 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Equinozzi, R., & Robuschi, M. (2006). Comparative efficacy and tolerability of pholcodine and dextromethorphan in the management of patients with acute, non-productive cough: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. Treatments in Respiratory Medicine, 5(6), 509–513. https://doi.org/10.2165/00151829-200605060-00014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free