A case study on the effect of using an anchored-discussion forum in a programming course

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the context of a programming course taught to college freshmen, we give an account of the switch from a classical, Moodle-based discussion forum to MIT’s NotaBene (NB) platform. One of the defining features of NB is to anchor each discussion thread to a given rectangular zone freely highlightable in any of the course’s PDF documents. In doing so, it forces a precise contextualization of every post–be it to a slide from the lectures, to a sentence from the instructions in the exercises, or to lines of code in the given exercise keys. We hypothesize that this feature lowers the contextualization effort needed to ask a question, thus strengthening students’ engagement and, ultimately, understanding of the matter. Using historical data on three years of giving the same course, we first examine and classify the students’ interventions with both the traditional and the NB-based approach to see if the questions significantly differ qualitatively or quantitatively. We also quantify the contextualization effort needed in both approaches. Finally, we discuss our teacher experience with both platforms and make recommendations on the choice such a discussion forum in a programming course.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pellet, J. P., Parriaux, G., & Overney, T. (2018). A case study on the effect of using an anchored-discussion forum in a programming course. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 11169 LNCS, pp. 42–54). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02750-6_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free