A new view on the scenario of karyotypic stasis in epinephelidae fish: Cytogenetic, historical, and biogeographic approaches

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Epinephelidae (groupers) is an astonishingly diverse group of carnivorous fish widely distributed in reef environments around the world, with growing economic importance. The first chromosomal inferences suggested a conservative scenario for the family. However, to date, this has not been validated using biogeographic and phylogenetic approaches. Thus, to estimate karyotype diversification among groupers, eight species from the Atlantic and Indian oceans were investigated using conventional cytogenetic protocols and fluorescence in situ hybridization of repetitive sequences (rDNA, microsatellites, transposable elements). Despite the remarkable persistence of some symplesiomorphic karyotype patterns, such as all species sharing 2n=48 and most preserve a basal karyotype (2n=48 acrocentrics), the chromosomal diversification in the family revealed an unsuspected evolutionary dynamic, where about 40% of the species escape from the ancestral karyotype pattern. These karyotype changes showed a relation with the historical biogeography, likely as a byproduct of the progressive occupancy of new areas (huge diversity of adaptive and speciation conditions). In this context, oceanic regions harboring more recent clades such as those of the Indo-Pacific, exhibited a higher karyotype diversity. Therefore, the karyotype evolution of Epinephelidae fits well with the expansion and geographic contingencies of its clades, providing a more complex and diverse scenario than previously assumed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amorim, K. D. J., Félix Da Costa, G. W. W., Cioffi, M. D. B., Tanomtong, A., Carlos Bertollo, L. A., & Molina, W. F. (2021). A new view on the scenario of karyotypic stasis in epinephelidae fish: Cytogenetic, historical, and biogeographic approaches. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 44(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2021-0122

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free