This chapter examines India’s wildlife sanctuaries as laboratories for understanding the nuanced relationship between science, democracy, and conservation. India’s 523 wildlife sanctuaries have been set aside by the Indian Wildlife Act for the purpose of conserving biodiversity and the natural heritage of the county. Amidst social and economic change, thesesanctuaries face the threats of urban growth, agricultural encroachment, and exploitation bymining and timber extraction. Even so, these wildlife sanctuaries cannot be considered pristine or characterized by wilderness because they have been recently created and have long been infl uenced by people. The purpose of this essay is to investigate the Kumbhalgarh Wildlife Sanctuary in Rajasthan in detail to understand the intertwining relationship between newinstitutions and complex landscapes, thereby providing a scientifi c opportunity to enhance our understanding of conservation science. A close examination of this sanctuary suggests: (1)ecological transitions in the sanctuary are multidirectional, (2) extensive conservation resources reside outside the sanctuary, and (3) ecological knowledge resources are extensive and untapped. These resultssuggest an adaptive management approach is paramount, insofar as itwould take advantage of the complex dynamics of reserves, as well as the inevitable human impact on the landscape and the considerable ecological knowledge possessed by local communities. © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015.
CITATION STYLE
Robbins, P., & Chhangani, A. K. (2015). Adaptive Management of India’s Wildlife Sanctuaries. In Spatial Diversity and Dynamics in Resources and Urban Development (pp. 235–251). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9771-9_12
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.