Improvement in the excised citrus leaf assay to investigate inoculation of ‘candidatus liberibacter asiaticus’ by the asian citrus psyllid diaphorina citri

16Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Huanglongbing (HLB) is a difficult-to-control and highly destructive citrus disease that, in Brazil, is associated mainly with the bacterium ‘Can-didatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ transmitted by the psyllid Diaphorina citri. The aim of this study was to improve our understanding of the ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’ infection process by exposing excised, fully expanded, immature citrus leaves in 50-ml Falcon tubes to one, four, or eight adults from a ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’-exposed colony for 1-, 3-, 7-, or 15-day periods for access to inoculation (IAP). The leaves were incubated at 26°C for 1, 3, 7, 15, and 21 days (incubation period [IP]). Infection frequencies and ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’ titers were assessed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). ‘Ca. L. asiaticus’ infection was a function of leaf age, number of insects, IAP, and IP. In general, higher infection rates were observed on younger leaves inoculated with higher numbers of insects and after longer IAP and IP. The immature excised leaf method allowed determination of 3 to 7 days as the range of time required by ‘Ca. L. asiat-icus’ to reach qPCR detectable levels. Even though leaf survival could be prolonged by the maintenance of a branch segment at the base of the leaf petiole, leaf degradation, visible after about 15 days IP, did not allow observation of the entire infection process which, in the intact plant, culminates with the appearance of the blotch mottling symptom on leaf blades.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Raiol-Junio, L. L., Baia, A. D. B., Luiz, F. Q. B. F., Fassini, C. G., Marques, V. V., & Lopes, S. A. (2017). Improvement in the excised citrus leaf assay to investigate inoculation of ‘candidatus liberibacter asiaticus’ by the asian citrus psyllid diaphorina citri. Plant Disease, 101(3), 409–413. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-08-16-1093-RE

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free