Pancreas preservation by the two-layer method: Does it have a beneficial effect compared with simple preservation in University of Wisconsin solution?

27Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A large number of reports have shown that the two-layer method (TLM), which employs oxygenated perfluorochemical (PFC) and University of Wisconsin (UW) solution, is superior to simple cold storage in UW in islet transplantation. However, two recent large-scale studies showed no beneficial effect of TLM compared with UW storage in human islet transplantation. We reevaluated the effect of TLM by following three groups: group 1: UW simple storage; group 2: TLM performed by multiorgan procurement teams (not specialists of islet isolation); and group 3: TLM performed by specialists of islet isolation (Noguchi and Matsumoto). There were no significant differences between groups 1 and 2, whereas islet yields were significantly higher in group 3 compared with either group 1 or 2. Our data suggest that exact, complete performance of TLM could improve the outcome of islet isolation and transplantation. In this review, we describe the mechanisms of the TLM, the procedure of preoxygenated TLM, and the several possibilities for the reasons of the discrepancy. Copyright © 2009 Cognizant Comm. Corp. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Noguchi, H., Levy, M. F., Kobayashi, N., & Matsumoto, S. (2009). Pancreas preservation by the two-layer method: Does it have a beneficial effect compared with simple preservation in University of Wisconsin solution? Cell Transplantation. Cognizant Communication Corporation. https://doi.org/10.1177/096368970901805-603

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free