Dietary methionine intake and risk of incident colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 8 prospective studies involving 431,029 participants

21Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Methionine is one of the key components of one carbon metabolism. Experimental studies indicate that methionine may reduce inflammation-induced colon cancer. However, epidemiologic findings as to whether dietary methionine intake influences colorectal cancer incidence in humans are inconsistent. Objective: To investigate the relationship between dietary methionine intake and risk of colorectal cancer by performing a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Methods: Eligible studies were identified by searching PubMed and Embase and by reviewing the bibliographies of the retrieved publications. The summary risk estimates were computed using both a random- effects and a fixed-effects model. Results: Eight eligible prospective cohort studies involving 431,029 participants and 6,331 colorectal cancer cases were identified. According to the random-effects model, the summary relative risks (RRs) for the highest compared with the lowest intake of methionine were 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.77-1.03) for colorectal cancer, 0.77 (95% CI = 0.64 - 0.92) for colon cancer, and 0.88 (95% CI = 0.55-1.42) for rectal cancer. In the stratified analysis, a significant inverse association between dietary methionine intake and risk of colorectal cancer was observed in studies with longer follow-up time (RR=0.81, 95% CI= 0.70- 0.95), in Western studies (RR= 0.83, 95% CI = 0.73 - 0.95) and in men (RR = 0.75, 95% CI= 0.57-0.99). We found no indication of publication bias. Conclusion: This meta-analysis indicates that dietary methionine intake may be associated with decreased risk of colorectal cancer, especially colon cancer. More prospective studies with long follow-up time are needed to confirm these findings. © 2013 Zhou et al.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Flow chart of study selection.
  • Figure 2. Forest plot showing relative risks of incident colorectal cancer for the highest compared with the lowest dietary methionine intake for individual studies and all studies combined. RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval.
  • Figure 3. Forest plot showing relative risks of incident colorectal cancer for an increase in dietary methionine intake of 1 mg/day for individual studies and all studies combined. RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval.
  • Table 1. Meta-analysis of risk estimates of dietary methionine intake (highest versus lowest) and risk of incident colorectal cancer.
  • Figure 4. Begg’s funnel plot with pseudo-95% confidence limits for the relative risks of colorectal cancer and dietary methionine intake (highest compared with lowest category of intake).

References Powered by Scopus

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

43159Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

32962Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global cancer statistics

31634Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Nutrients, foods, and colorectal cancer prevention

527Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

B vitamins and one-carbon metabolism: Implications in human health and disease

213Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Methyl donor micronutrients that modify DNA methylation and cancer outcome

181Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhou, Z. Y., Wan, X. Y., & Cao, J. W. (2013). Dietary methionine intake and risk of incident colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 8 prospective studies involving 431,029 participants. PLoS ONE, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083588

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

74%

Researcher 4

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 11

58%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

26%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

11%

Chemistry 1

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0