Diagnostic Value of CircRNAs as Potential Biomarkers in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Meta-Analysis

19Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Circular RNAs (CircRNAs), an emerging non-coding RNA, have been demonstrated to be involved in tumorigenesis, metastasis, and cancer progression, and could represent novel potential biomarkers for diagnosing oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). However, no meta-analysis has investigated the diagnostic role of circRNAs in OSCC. Hence, to investigate whether circRNAs could serve as specific biomarkers for OSCC, the present systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic efficiency of circRNAs in patients with OSCC. Materials and Methods: A thorough search of online databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) was conducted to collect relevant studies up to March 30th, 2021. All eligible studies were case-control studies. The quality of each study was evaluated by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. STATA (version 15.1) and Review Manager (version 5.4) were employed to conduct the meta-analysis, and the PRISMA statement was adopted in this study. Results: A total of 16 studies were included in the meta-analysis, with five studies on upregulated circRNAs, and 11 on downregulated circRNAs. The enrolled studies that met our eligibility criteria all derived from China. The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and the area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) with the 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were 0.74 (0.69–0.79), 0.79 (0.73–0.84), 10.74 (7.81–14.77), 3.50 (2.78–4.45), 0.33 (0.27–0.39) and 0.83 (0.79–0.86), respectively. The subgroup analysis demonstrated that serum, plasma, and saliva specimens had a better diagnostic performance than tissue samples, with a high value of sensitivity, specificity, DOR, and AUC values. The results also showed that the subgroups of upregulated circRNAs and a sample size of ≥100 manifested higher specificity, DOR, and AUC for cancer detection than downregulated circRNAs and a sample size of < 100. Conclusions: A strong association was demonstrated between the dysregulated expression of circRNAs and the diagnosis of OSCC. Hence, circRNAs have the potential to function as promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets for OSCC. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, number CRD42021256857.

References Powered by Scopus

Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries

70213Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quadas-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies

11137Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies The PRISMA-DTA Statement

2388Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Promising applications of human-derived saliva biomarker testing in clinical diagnostics

124Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Circular rna—is the circle perfect?

42Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Review: The Significance of Toll-Like Receptors 2 and 4, and NF-κB Signaling in Endothelial Cells during Atherosclerosis

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, M., Zhang, L., Ren, W., Li, S., Zhi, K., Zheng, J., & Gao, L. (2021, July 8). Diagnostic Value of CircRNAs as Potential Biomarkers in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: a Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Oncology. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.693284

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

80%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

40%

Design 1

20%

Chemistry 1

20%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0