Ignorance is bliss: The role of observer expectation in dynamic spatial tuning of the attentional focus

32Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

When two sequential targets (T1, T2) are inserted in an RSVP stream of distractors, perception of T2 is impaired at intertarget lags shorter than 700 msec. Paradoxically, this deficit disappears when T2 is presented directly afterT1 (lag-1 sparing). Visser, Bischof, and Di Lollo(1999) found that lag-1 sparing occurs only when T1 and T2 are presented in the same stream. In contrast, Shih (2000) obtained lag-1 sparing with targets in separate streams. Four experiments addressed this inconsistency and revealed lag-1 sparing with targets in different streams, but only when observers had no foreknowledge of T1's location. We hypothesized that when T1 location is known, attention is focused narrowly on that stream; if T2 then appears in the other stream it is missed, and lag-1 sparing does not occur. When T1 location is not known, attention is focused broadly, encompassing both streams, and lag-1 sparing ensues. Copyright 2007 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jefferies, L. N., Ghorashi, S., Kawahara, J. I., & Di Lollo, V. (2007). Ignorance is bliss: The role of observer expectation in dynamic spatial tuning of the attentional focus. Perception and Psychophysics, 69(7), 1162–1174. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193953

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free