When two sequential targets (T1, T2) are inserted in an RSVP stream of distractors, perception of T2 is impaired at intertarget lags shorter than 700 msec. Paradoxically, this deficit disappears when T2 is presented directly afterT1 (lag-1 sparing). Visser, Bischof, and Di Lollo(1999) found that lag-1 sparing occurs only when T1 and T2 are presented in the same stream. In contrast, Shih (2000) obtained lag-1 sparing with targets in separate streams. Four experiments addressed this inconsistency and revealed lag-1 sparing with targets in different streams, but only when observers had no foreknowledge of T1's location. We hypothesized that when T1 location is known, attention is focused narrowly on that stream; if T2 then appears in the other stream it is missed, and lag-1 sparing does not occur. When T1 location is not known, attention is focused broadly, encompassing both streams, and lag-1 sparing ensues. Copyright 2007 Psychonomic Society, Inc.
CITATION STYLE
Jefferies, L. N., Ghorashi, S., Kawahara, J. I., & Di Lollo, V. (2007). Ignorance is bliss: The role of observer expectation in dynamic spatial tuning of the attentional focus. Perception and Psychophysics, 69(7), 1162–1174. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193953
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.