Ion Exchange to Capture Iron after Real Effluent Treatment by Fenton’s Process

6Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The main drawback of Fenton′ s process is the formation of ferric sludge. In this work, ion exchange (IE) appears as a complement to the Fenton process, allowing, on the one hand, to remove the iron excess present in the sludge, as well as reduce the COD of the real olive oil industry extraction wastewater (OOIEW) from the Fenton process. The Fenton process uses iron (II) sulfate as catalyst, therefore concentrations of iron up to 2 g L−1 could be present in the treated OOIEW. The iron and COD adsorption equilibrium behavior has been modelized by Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin isotherms. Moreover, the resin efficiency was tested in a continuous fixed-bed column. It was concluded that the resin maintains iron adsorption capacity over at least three reuse cycles. Overall Fenton’s process followed by ion exchange seems to be a promising approach for the treatment of cumbersome industrial wastewaters.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Domingues, E., Fernandes, E., Vaz, T., Gomes, J., Castro-Silva, S., Martins, R. C., … Ferreira, L. M. (2022). Ion Exchange to Capture Iron after Real Effluent Treatment by Fenton’s Process. Water (Switzerland), 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/w14050706

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free