Complexity and accuracy of hand-crafted detection methods compared to convolutional neural networks

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Even though Convolutional Neural Networks have had the best accuracy in the last few years, they have a price in term of computational complexity and memory footprint, due to a large number of multiply-accumulate operations and model parameters. For embedded systems, this complexity severely limits the opportunities to reduce power consumption, which is dominated by memory read and write operations. Anticipating the oncoming integration into intelligent sensor devices, we compare hand-crafted features for the detection of a limited number of objects against some typical convolutional neural network architectures. Experiments on some state-of-the-art datasets, addressing detection tasks, show that for some problems the increased complexity of neural networks is not reflected by a large increase in accuracy. Moreover, our analysis suggests that for embedded devices hand-crafted features are still competitive in terms of accuracy/complexity trade-offs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tomaselli, V., Plebani, E., Strano, M., & Pau, D. (2017). Complexity and accuracy of hand-crafted detection methods compared to convolutional neural networks. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10484 LNCS, pp. 298–308). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68560-1_27

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free