Evaluations of dual attractant toxic sugar baits for surveillance and control of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Florida

34Citations
Citations of this article
115Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Dual attractant toxic sugar baits (D-ATSB) containing two host kairomones, L-lactic (LA) and 1-octen-3-ol (O), and fruit-based attractants were evaluated through olfactory, consumption and mortality, and semi-field experiments to determine if host kairomones could first, enhance attraction of a fruit-based (attractant) toxic sugar bait (ATSB), and second, increase the efficacy of a fruit based attractive toxic sugar bait (ATSB). Methods: Four combinations of LA and O were incorporated into the ATSB and evaluated in an olfactometer to determine if these combinations could enhance attraction of Aedes aegypti (L.) to the bait. Ae. albopictus (Skuse) and Ae. aegypti were used to determine bait consumption through excrement droplet counts and percent mortality, of the most attractive D-ATSB (1% LA and 1% O) from the olfactory study. Semi-field evaluations were conducted in screened portable field cages to determine if the D-ATSB applied to non-flowering plants controlled more mosquitoes than the fruit-based ATSB, and ASB. Mosquitoes were exposed to D-ATSB and the two controls for 48 h and collected with BGS traps. The catch rates of the BGS traps were compared to determine efficacy of the D-ATSB. Results: During olfactometer evaluations of D-ATSB, Ae. aegypti mosquitoes were more attracted to 1% LA and 1% O compared to the fruit-based toxic sugar bait alone. Both species of mosquito consumed more fruit-based non-toxic bait (ASB) and ATSB than the D-ATSB. For both species, percent mortality bioassays indicated D-ATSB controlled mosquitoes, as compared to non-toxic control, but not more than the fruit based ATSB. Semi-field evaluations, BioGents sentinel traps at 48 h confirmed that ATSB (positive control) controlled Ae. albopictus, but there was no statistical difference between ASB (negative control) and the D-ATSB. No differences were observed between the mosquitoes caught in any of the experimental formulations for Ae. aegypti. Conclusions: L-lactic (1%) and 1-octen-3-ol (1%) added to a fruit-based sugar bait increased attraction of Ae. aegypti and may have future implications in mosquito trapping devices. The addition of the host kairomones did not enhance the consumption and efficacy of the ATSB in laboratory or semi-field evaluations for both mosquito species. We attribute to the absence of other host cues leading to lack of alighting onto bait surfaces to imbibe the toxic bait, as well as a possible decrease in palatability of the bait caused by the addition of the host kairomones.

References Powered by Scopus

Advances in fruit aroma volatile research

650Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Insect odor and taste receptors

397Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Analysis of human skin emanations by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. 2. Identification of volatile compounds that are candidate attractants for the yellow fever mosquito (Aedes aegypti)

367Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Mosquito Attractants

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mosquito phytophagy – sources exploited, ecological function, and evolutionary transition to haematophagy

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Household dengue prevention interventions, expenditures, and barriers to Aedes aegypti control in Machala, Ecuador

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scott-Fiorenzano, J. M., Fulcher, A. P., Seeger, K. E., Allan, S. A., Kline, D. L., Koehler, P. G., … Xue, R. D. (2017). Evaluations of dual attractant toxic sugar baits for surveillance and control of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in Florida. Parasites and Vectors, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1937-z

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 45

66%

Researcher 14

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31

58%

Medicine and Dentistry 13

25%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 5

9%

Engineering 4

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free