The patient/client/consumer/service user and medical ethics 40 years on

2Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This essay, written from my non-doctor's 'lay' perspective, sketches a gradually improving approach to medical ethics over the 40-year period since this journal was founded. A central feature of this improvement has been the increasing focus of medical ethics on the interests and perspectives of the patients/clients/ consumers/service users, whose interests doctors and other healthcare workers serve. Events such as misuse of the end of life 'Liverpool Care Pathway' and the shockingly poor care revealed in National Health Service hospitals in Mid-Staffordshire show that these improvements are by no means universal. Nonetheless, there has been a steady improvement in general terms towards putting patients first and it is not flattery to say that in its consistent support for this concern and in its promotion of non-medical involvement in medical ethics education the Journal of Medical Ethics has itself made a significant contribution to 'doing good medical ethics'.

References Powered by Scopus

Ethics and clinical research.

1376Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Medical ethics: Four principles plus attention to scope

738Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Some limits of informed consent

441Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

First Year Medical Students’ Perceptions Towards Integration of Medical Law in the Medical Curriculum: a Pilot Study

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fundamental issues in epistemic injustice in healthcare

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Neuberger, J. (2015). The patient/client/consumer/service user and medical ethics 40 years on. Journal of Medical Ethics, 41(1), 22–24. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2014-102378

Readers over time

‘15‘16‘17‘19‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

62%

Researcher 3

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

38%

Business, Management and Accounting 4

31%

Social Sciences 3

23%

Computer Science 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0