In-depth study of DNA binding of Cys2His2 finger domains in testis zinc-finger protein

1Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Previously, we identified that both fingers 1 and 2 in the three Cys2His2 zinc-finger domains (TZD) of testis zinc-finger protein specifically bind to its cognate DNA; however, finger 3 is non-sequence-specific. To gain insights into the interaction mechanism, here we further investigated the DNA-binding characteristics of TZD bound to non-specific DNAs and its finger segments bound to cognate DNA. TZD in non-specific DNA binding showed smaller chemical shift perturbations, as expected. However, the direction of shift perturbation, change of DNA imino-proton NMR signal, and dynamics on the 15N backbone atom significantly differed between specific and non-specific binding. Using these unique characteristics, we confirmed that the three single-finger segments (TZD1, TZD2 and TZD3) and the two-finger segment (TZD23) non-specifically bind to the cognate DNA. In comparison, the other two-finger segment (TZD12) binding to the cognate DNA features simultaneous nonspecific and semi-specific binding, both slowly exchanged in terms of NMR timescale. The process of TZD binding to the cognate DNA is likely stepwise: initially TZD non-specifically binds to DNA, then fingers 1 and 2 insert cooperatively into the major groove of DNA by semi-specific binding, and finally finger 3 non-specifically binds to DNA, which promotes the specific binding on fingers 1 and 2 and stabilizes the formation of a specific TZD-DNA complex.

Figures

  • Fig 1. Binding characteristics of the TZD-DNA complex and the design of TZD fragments and non-specific sequences. (A) Left, side-chains of the residues at discrete position -1 and helix positions 2, 3 and 6 in zf1 (Leu15, His17, Gln18 and Thr21), shown in green, and zf2 (Asp43, Ser45, Ala46 and Lys49), shown in blue, deeply insert into the major groove of the cognate DNA in TZD-DNA complex model. Zinc ions, Zn2+, are shown in orange balls. Right, schematic of the predicted contacts of zf1 (green) and zf2 (blue) of TZD with the cognate DNA, from positions -1, 2, 3 and 6 of the α-helix. (B) Amino acid sequences of TZD in one-letter codes and the range of each finger segment. Secondary structural elements of TZD and positions -1, 2, 3 and 6 of the α-helix that typically make sequence-specific contacts with DNA in classical zinc finger are labeled on the top. (C) The cognate (or specific) DNA contains a single 10–bp core region
  • Fig 2. Comparisons of chemical shift perturbations and backbone 15N atom dynamics between non-specific and specific TZD–DNA complexes. Superimposition of (A) 15N-HSQC spectra for the free TZD (black) and TZD bound to the non-specific DNA (green) and (B) free TZD (black) and TZD bound to the specific DNA (red). Residues with significant shift changes are shown with black arrows. Compared to non-specific binding in (A), shift perturbations with specific binding are larger and the directions of shift perturbations significantly differ, and the represented residues showing chemical shift direction change are in magenta boxes. (C) Superimposition of the weighted chemical shift perturbation between nonspecific (green) and specific (red) bindings. The secondary structures of TZD are labelled above the histograms and Pro residues are indicated by asterisks. (D) Comparison of backbone atom dynamics for 15N R1 and R2 values among the free TZD (black), non-specific TZD-DNA (green), and specific TZD–DNA (red) complexes.
  • Fig 3. DNA binding kinetics analysis. Spectra of DNA-binding affinities measured by bio-layer interferometry technology (Octet Red system, ForteBio) for TZD and finger segments in complex with the cognate DNA at different concentrations.
  • Table 1. Dissociation rate constants of TZD and finger segments in complex with specific and non-specific (16N3) DNA.
  • Fig 4. Comparisons of 1D DNA imino-proton NMR signals of the cognate DNA in the free and bound forms. (A) Superimposition of imino-proton spectra for the free cognate DNA (in black) and the cognate DNA bound to TZD (in red). Superimposition of imino-proton spectra for (B) the free cognate DNA (in black) and the cognate DNA bound to TZD23 (in cyan) and (C) the cognate DNA in complex with TZD12 (in cyan) and TZD (in red).
  • Fig 5. Comparisons of chemical shift perturbations of single-finger segments. Superimposition of 1H-15N HSQC spectra for (A) free TZD1 (in black) and TZD1 bound to the cognate DNA (in blue) with assignments annotated on the free TZD1, (B) free TZD2 (in black) and TZD2 (in blue) bound to the cognate DNA with assignments annotated on the free TZD2 and (C) free TZD3 and TZD3 bound to the cognate DNA with assignments annotated on the free TZD3 (both spectra are nearly identical). Residues with significant shift changes are shown with black arrows. (D) Superimposition of the weighted chemical shift perturbations for the specific TZD–DNA complex (red) and the single-finger segment bound to the cognate DNA (blue). The secondary structures of TZD are labelled above the histograms and Pro residues are indicated by asterisks.
  • Fig 6. Comparisons of chemical shift perturbations of two-finger segments. Superimposition of (A) 1H-15N HSQC spectra for the free TZD12 (in black) and TZD12 bound to the cognate DNA (in blue) with assignments annotated on the free TZD12, (B) weighted chemical shift perturbations for the specific TZD–DNA complex (red) and TZD12 bound to the cognate DNA (blue), (C) 1H-15N HSQC spectra for the free TZD23 (in black) and TZD23 bound to the cognate DNA (in blue) with assignments annotated on the free TZD23, and (D) weighted chemical shift perturbations for the specific TZD–DNA complex (red) and TZD23 bound to the cognate DNA (blue). Residues with significant shift changes are shown with black arrows. The secondary structures of TZD are labelled above the histograms and Pro residues are indicated by asterisks.
  • Fig 7. 15N spin relaxation measurements for TZD12. (A),(B) Comparison of 15N R1 and R2 relaxation data among free TZD12 (blue unfilled circles), TZD12 bound to the cognate DNA (blue filled circles), free TZD (black open circles) and TZD in specific binding (black filled circles). To clarify, the helical regions are shown with grey background. (C) Comparison of 1H-15N heteronuclear nuclear Overhauser effect of TZD12 in the free (blue unfilled circles) and bound (blue filled circles) forms. The TGEKP linker shown in yellow background between fingers 1 and 2 clearly becomes more rigid when bound to the cognate DNA. Error bars represent fitting errors.

References Powered by Scopus

NMRPipe: A multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes

12378Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging

2129Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Zinc finger proteins: New insights into structural and functional diversity

1254Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Zinc binding of a Cys2His2-type zinc finger protein is enhanced by the interaction with DNA

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chou, C. C., Wei, S. Y., Lou, Y. C., & Chen, C. (2017). In-depth study of DNA binding of Cys2His2 finger domains in testis zinc-finger protein. PLoS ONE, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175051

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

77%

Researcher 2

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Chemistry 5

42%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

33%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

17%

Engineering 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0