Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Among Pregnancies Complicated by Isolated Oligohydramnios Compared with Normal Amniotic Fluid Index

  • Shrestha R
  • Uprety D
  • Thakur A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims: The study was aimed to compare the maternal and perinatal outcomes among pregnancies with isolated oligohydramnios compared to normal amniotic fluid volume  between 37-42 weeks.Methods: It was a prospective cohort study done among the singleton pregnancies between 37-42 weeks with isolated oligohydramnios taken as cases (n=100) and pregnancies with normal levels of amniotic fluid matched to cases by gestational age and parity in 2:1 ratio fulfilling the inclusion criteria were taken as controls (n=200). Both the mother and baby were followed up till discharge for outcomes.Results: Majority of the patients (n=300) were of  age group 20-30 years (79.0%). Most of them (n=300) were primigravida (74.0%). The overall caesarean section rate was 24.66% (n=300). In the oligohydramnios group, 43.0% had undergone induction of labour (p value<0.05), 63.0% had undergone caesarean section (p value=0.001) and the most common indication for caesarean section was non-reassuring NST (44.44%) (p value<0.05). 26.0% babies had low birth weight, 12% had birth defects, 10.0% were small for gestational age (p value<0.05). There were significantly more ICU admission (13.0% vs 3.5%), early neonatal death (6.0% vs 1.5%), fetal distress (6.0% vs 1.5%) in the oligohydramnios compared to control group ( p value<0.05).Conclusions: Patients with oligohydramnios have increased labour induction, increased operative interferences and increased neonatal mortality and morbidity compared to patients with normal fluid volume.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shrestha, R., Uprety, D., & Thakur, A. (2017). Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Among Pregnancies Complicated by Isolated Oligohydramnios Compared with Normal Amniotic Fluid Index. Nepal Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 11(2), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.3126/njog.v11i2.17458

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free