The new liver allocation score for transplantation is validated and improved transplant survival benefit in Germany but not in the United Kingdom

22Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Prognostic models for the prediction of 90-day mortality after transplantation with pretransplant donor and recipient variables are needed to calculate transplant benefit. Transplants in adult recipients in Germany (Hannover, n = 770; Kiel, n = 234) and the United Kingdom (Birmingham, n = 829) were used for prognostic model design and validation in separate training and validation cohorts. The survival benefit of transplantation was estimated by subtracting the observed posttransplant 90-day mortality from the expected 90-day mortality without transplantation determined by the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. A prognostic model called the liver allocation score (LivAS) was derived using a randomized sample from Hannover using pretransplant donor and recipient variables. This model could be validated in the German training and validation cohorts (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC] > 0.70) but not in the English cohort (AUROC, 0.58). Although 90-day mortality rates after transplantation were 13.7% in Hannover, 12.1% in Kiel, and 8.3% in Birmingham, the calculated 90-day survival benefits of transplantation were 6.8% in Hannover, 7.8% in Kiel, and 2.8% in Birmingham. Deployment of the LivAS for limiting allocation to donor and recipient combinations with likely 90-day survival as indicated by pretransplant LivAS values below the cutoff value would have increased the survival benefit to 12.9% in the German cohorts, whereas this would have decreased the benefit in England to 1.3%. The English and German cohorts revealed significant differences in 21 of 28 pretransplant variables. In conclusion, the LivAS could be validated in Germany and may improve German allocation policies leading to greater survival benefits, whereas validation failed in England due to profound differences in the selection criteria for liver transplantation. This study suggests the need for national prognostic models. Even though the German centers had higher rates of 90-day mortality, estimated survival benefits were greater. Liver Transplantation 22 743-756 2016 AASLD.

References Powered by Scopus

Index for rating diagnostic tests

9017Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

2461Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers

2197Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A Critical Review of MELD as a Reliable Tool for Transplant Prioritization

53Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Toronto Postliver Transplantation Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence Calculator: A Machine Learning Approach

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Systematic Review of Public Preferences for the Allocation of Donor Organs for Transplantation: Principles of Distributive Justice

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schrem, H., Focken, M., Gunson, B., Reichert, B., Mirza, D., Kreipe, H. H., … Neuberger, J. (2016). The new liver allocation score for transplantation is validated and improved transplant survival benefit in Germany but not in the United Kingdom. Liver Transplantation, 22(6), 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.24421

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

56%

Researcher 7

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 17

68%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

12%

Engineering 3

12%

Neuroscience 2

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free