Reproducibility and validity of the Diet Quality Index Revised as assessed by use of a food-frequency questionnaire

151Citations
Citations of this article
173Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The Diet Quality Index Revised (DQI-R) is a dietary assessment instrument based on 10 dietary recommendations reflecting dietary guidelines and policy in the United States. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the reproducibility and validity of the DQI-R as measured by use of food-frequency questionnaires (FFQs). Design: Diet was assessed separately by two FFQs at a 1-y interval and by two 1-wk diet records. DQI-R scores were computed from each method. Venous blood specimens were collected for measurement of dietary biomarkers. Participants (n = 127) were men aged 40-75 y in a validation study of the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Results: Mean DQI-R scores were 69.5 for FFQ-1, 67.2 for FFQ-2, and 62.0 for the diet records out of a possible score of 100. The reproducibility correlation for the 2 FFQ scores was 0.72. Correlations between scores for each of the 2 FFQs and diet records were 0.66 (FFQ-1) and 0.72 (FFQ-2). DQI-R scores from FFQ-2 were directly correlated with plasma biochemical measurements of α-carotene (r = 0.43, P < 0.0005), β-carotene (r = 0.35, P < 0.005), lutein (r = 0.31, P <0.005), and α-tocopherol (r = 0.25, P < 0.05) and were inversely correlated with plasma total cholesterol (r = -0.22, P < 0.05). Conclusions: These data indicate reasonable reproducibility and validity of the DQI-R as assessed by an FFQ. Future studies are needed to examine whether this index and other instruments of diet quality can reliably predict disease outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Newby, P. K., Hu, F. B., Rimm, E. B., Smith-Warner, S. A., Feskanich, D., Sampson, L., & Willett, W. C. (2003). Reproducibility and validity of the Diet Quality Index Revised as assessed by use of a food-frequency questionnaire. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 78(5), 941–949. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/78.5.941

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free