Percutaneous extraction of transvenous permanent pacemaker/defibrillator leads

4Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Widespread use of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices has inevitably increased the need for lead revision/replacement. We report our experience in percutaneous extraction of transvenous permanent pacemaker/defibrillator leads. Methods. Thirty-six patients admitted to our centre from September 2005 through October 2012 for percutaneous lead extraction were included. Lead removal was attempted using Spectranetics traction-type system (Spectranetics Corp., Colorado, CO, USA) and VascoExtor countertraction-type system (Vascomed GmbH, Weil am Rhein, Germany). Results. Lead extraction was attempted in 59 leads from 36 patients (27 men), mean ± SD age 61±5 years, with permanent pacemaker (n=25), defibrillator (n=8), or cardiac resynchronisation therapy (n=3) with a mean ± SD implant duration of 50±23 months. The indications for lead removal included pocket infection (n=23), endocarditis (n=2), and ventricular (n=10) and atrial lead dysfunction (n=1). Traction device was used for 33 leads and countertraction device for 26 leads. Mean ± SD fluoroscopy time was 4±2 minutes/lead for leads implanted <48 months (n=38) and 7±3 minutes/lead for leads implanted >48 months (n=21), P=0.03. Complete procedural success rate was 91.7% and clinical procedural success rate was 100%, while lead procedural success rate was 95%. Conclusions. In conclusion, percutaneous extraction of transvenous permanent pacemaker/defibrillator leads using dedicated removal tools is both feasible and safe. © 2014 Stylianos Paraskevaidis et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paraskevaidis, S., Konstantinou, D., Vassilikos, V., Theofilogiannakos, E., Mantziari, L., Megarisiotou, A., … Karvounis, C. (2014). Percutaneous extraction of transvenous permanent pacemaker/defibrillator leads. BioMed Research International, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/949785

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free