Access flow reduction for cardiac failure

15Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

High-flow in hemodialysis arteriovenous angioaccesses is frequent. It may result in high-output cardiac failure, which should be prevented by fistula flow reduction. The most frequently reported flow reduction procedure is banding but immediate and long-term results are questionable. Alternative techniques are related here with personal results. Juxta-anastomosis “Proximal Radial Artery Ligation” (PRAL) is a very simple and effective reduction technique for side-to-end radio-cephalic fistulas (82 patients; reduction rate [RR]: 54% ± 19%). For brachial artery-based fistulas flow reduction two variants of Revision Using Distal Inflow (RUDI) procedures are used: 1) RUDI-1 using a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft or a greater saphenous vein, which we first described in 1989 as “Distal Report of the Arterial Inflow” (35 patients; RR: 53% ± 18%), 2) RUDI-2 procedure, “Transposition of the Radial Artery”, which we described in 2009 (47 patients; RR: 66% ± 14%).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bourquelot, P. (2016). Access flow reduction for cardiac failure. Journal of Vascular Access, 17, S60–S63. https://doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000517

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free