Migraine and the risk of cervical artery dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

5Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Migraine is a common, disabling chronic pain condition possibly related to changes in endothelial and vascular structure and function. Several observational studies have suggested an elevated risk of cervical artery dissection (CeAD) in patients with a history of migraine. We aimed to investigate this potential association using systematic review and meta-analytic methods. Patients and methods: We utilized a pre-defined search protocol to identify and screen studies related to migraine and CeAD in PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science Core Collection. We assessed the risk of bias and performed a meta-analysis of selected studies to assess the association between migraine and CeAD. We also performed subgroup analyses by migraine subtype, biological sex, and the use of stroke versus non-stroke controls. Results: We identified 11 studies (N = 9857 patients) for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed an association between migraine and CeAD with an odds ratio of 1.74 (95%CI 1.38–2.19). There was high heterogeneity among the included studies (I2 = 61%). Publication bias was present but the Trim-Fill imputation suggested that the impact on results was likely minimal. Subgroup analyses revealed an association between migraine without aura and CeAD (OR 1.86, 95%CI 1.55–2.24) but not migraine with aura and CeAD (OR 1.15, 95%CI 0.71–1.88). There was no difference in the association between migraine and CeAD in men compared to women. Discussion and conclusion: A history of migraine is associated with an increased risk of CeAD. Further studies are needed to elucidate the potential pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying this association.

References Powered by Scopus

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

49356Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

48492Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

43246Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Safety considerations in the treatment with anti-CGRP(R) monoclonal antibodies in patients with migraine

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reviewing migraine-associated pathophysiology and its impact on elevated stroke risk

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Vertebral artery dissection in a patient with migraine treated with calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody: a case report and FAERS database analysis

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sun, Z., Kleine-Borgmann, J., Suh, J., McDermott, G. C., Vishnevetsky, A., & Rist, P. M. (2023). Migraine and the risk of cervical artery dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Stroke Journal, 8(4), 904–914. https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873231191860

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

44%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

33%

Researcher 2

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

50%

Neuroscience 3

38%

Mathematics 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free