Quantification of myocardial blood flow using model based analysis of first-pass perfusion MRI: Extraction fraction of Gd-DTPA varies with myocardial blood flow in human myocardium

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

For the absolute quantification of myocardial blood flow (MBF), Patlak plot-derived K1 need to be converted to MBF by using the relation between the extraction fraction of gadolinium contrast agent and MBF. This study was conducted to determine the relation between extraction fraction of Gd-DTPA and MBF in human heart at rest and during stress. Thirty-four patients (19 men, mean age of 66.5 ± 11.0 years) with normal coronary arteries and no myocardial infarction were retrospectively evaluated. First-pass myocardial perfusion MRI during adenosine triphosphate stress and at rest was performed using a dual bolus approach to correct for saturation of the blood signal. Myocardial K1 was quantified by Patlak plot method. Mean MBF was determined from coronary sinus flow measured by phase contrast cine MRI and left ventricle mass measured by cine MRI. The extraction fraction of Gd-DTPA was calculated as the K1 divided by the mean MBF. The extraction fraction of Gd-DTPA was 0.46 ± 0.22 at rest and 0.32 ± 0.13 during stress (P < 0.001). The relationship between extraction fraction (E) and MBF in human myocardium can be approximated as E = 1 - exp(-(0.14 × MBF + 0.56)/MBF). The current results indicate that MBF can be accurately quantified by Patlak plot method of first-pass myocardial perfusion MRI by performing a correction of extraction fraction. Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ishida, M., Ichihara, T., Nagata, M., Ishida, N., Takase, S., Kurita, T., … Sakuma, H. (2011). Quantification of myocardial blood flow using model based analysis of first-pass perfusion MRI: Extraction fraction of Gd-DTPA varies with myocardial blood flow in human myocardium. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 66(5), 1391–1399. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22936

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free