A predictive phosphorylation signature of lung cancer

13Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Aberrant activation of signaling pathways drives many of the fundamental biological processes that accompany tumor initiation and progression. Inappropriate phosphorylation of intermediates in these signaling pathways are a frequently observed molecular lesion that accompanies the undesirable activation or repression of pro- and antioncogenic pathways. Therefore, methods which directly query signaling pathway activation via phosphorylation assays in individual cancer biopsies are expected to provide important insights into the molecular "logic" that distinguishes cancer and normal tissue on one hand, and enables personalized intervention strategies on the other. Results: We first document the largest available set of tyrosine phosphorylation sites that are, individually, differentially phosphorylated in lung cancer, thus providing an immediate set of drug targets. Next, we develop a novel computational methodology to identify pathways whose phosphorylation activity is strongly correlated with the lung cancer phenotype. Finally, we demonstrate the feasibility of classifying lung cancers based on multi-variate phosphorylation signatures. Conclusions: Highly predictive and biologically transparent phosphorylation signatures of lung cancer provide evidence for the existence of a robust set of phosphorylation mechanisms (captured by the signatures) present in the majority of lung cancers, and that reliably distinguish each lung cancer from normal. This approach should improve our understanding of cancer and help guide its treatment, since the phosphorylation signatures highlight proteins and pathways whose phosphorylation should be inhibited in order to prevent unregulated proliferation. © 2009 Wu et al.

Figures

  • Table 1. The 20 protein sites most differentially phosphorylated between normal and NSCLC samples.
  • Table 2. The performances of the predictive models for normal/tumor classification.
  • Table 3. The top 15 protein-sets from MSigDB C2 database for normal/tumor classification.
  • Figure 1. The EGFR signaling pathway. Pink indicates higher phosphorylation in tumor samples, while green indicates higher phosphorylation in normal tissue samples. Yellow nodes were observed to be phosphorylated, however did not change significantly in the two types. Gray nodes were not observed in the analysis. A red arrow (or edge) relates a kinase to its target, green edges indicate a phosphatase and its target. Blue edges indicate activation, which may not be direct. Finally, a diamond shape on the end of an edge indicates phosphorylation, while a circle indicates an inhibition of phosphorylation. Arrowheads indicate activation, which may be indirect. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007994.g001

References Powered by Scopus

Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles

35977Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Understanding the warburg effect: The metabolic requirements of cell proliferation

12382Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Activating Mutations in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Underlying Responsiveness of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer to Gefitinib

10534Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Role of ABL family kinases in cancer: From leukaemia to solid tumours

370Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Proteomic analysis of podocyte exosome-enriched fraction from normal human urine

133Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prenatal tobacco smoke exposure is associated with childhood DNA CpG methylation

104Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wu, C. J., Cai, T., Rikova, K., Merberg, D., Kasif, S., & Steffen, M. (2009). A predictive phosphorylation signature of lung cancer. PLoS ONE, 4(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007994

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2302468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

51%

Researcher 13

35%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20

49%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 12

29%

Computer Science 5

12%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0