Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 17: Bone growth stimulators as an adjunct for lumbar fusion

24Citations
Citations of this article
97Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The relationship between the formation of a solid arthrodesis and electrical and electromagnetic energy is well established; most of the information on the topic, however, pertains to the healing of long bone fractures. The use of both invasive and noninvasive means to supply this energy and supplement spinal fusions has been investigated. Three forms of electrical stimulation are routinely used: direct current stimulation (DCS), pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation (PEMFS), and capacitive coupled electrical stimulation (CCES). Only DCS requires the placement of electrodes within the fusion substrate and is inserted at the time of surgery. Since publication of the original guidelines, few studies have investigated the use of bone growth stimulators. Based on the current review, no conflict with the previous recommendations was generated. The use of DCS is recommended as an option for patients younger than 60 years of age, since a positive effect on fusion has been observed. The same, however, cannot be stated for patients over 60, because DCS did not appear to have an impact on fusion rates in this population. No study was reviewed that investigated the use of CCES or the routine use of PEMFS. A single low-level study demonstrated a positive impact of PEMFS on patients undergoing revision surgery for pseudarthrosis, but this single study is insufficient 0 to recommend for or against the use of PEMFS in this patient population. ©AANS, 2014.

References Powered by Scopus

Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: Four-year results in the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts

559Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Chronic low back pain and fusion: A comparison of three surgical techniques: A prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group

461Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The development of the dallas pain questionnaire an assessment of the impact of spinal pain on behavior

202Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Failure in Lumbar Spinal Fusion and Current Management Modalities

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Capacitive-resistive radiofrequency therapy to treat postpartum perineal pain: A randomized study

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Appraisal of the Quality of Neurosurgery Clinical Practice Guidelines

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kaiser, M. G., Eck, J. C., Groff, M. W., Ghogawala, Z., Watters, W. C., Dailey, A. T., … Mummaneni, P. V. (2014). Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 17: Bone growth stimulators as an adjunct for lumbar fusion. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 21(1), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.4.SPINE14326

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 26

57%

Researcher 10

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 43

75%

Neuroscience 6

11%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

9%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 16

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free